A growing number of governments now recognise subsea telecommunications cables as critical infrastructure, vital to national security, the economy and the delivery of public services. What should such a qualification mean for public-private cooperation around threat detection and incident response?
Is intentional damage to subsea cables by States or State-backed actors really increasing as often reported by the media?
In what way would the response to such threats differ from the kinds of threats the industry traditionally deals with?
What are the opportunities of current geopolitical developments for the subsea cable industry? Are there evident winners and losers?
From a corporate strategy perspective, how should the industry be thinking about future geopolitical risks?