View the full conference programme for Subsea Security Summit 2026 and the co-located Submarine Networks EMEA 2026

Create your personal agenda –check the favourite icon
How public policy advocacy is becoming a necessity for submarine cable operator.
Head to the Exhibition Hall for the chance to network with 1,500 senior-level attendees from the global submarine cable industry.
Introductory sessions for industry newcomers giving a high-level overview of key aspects of the submarine cable market. Please note these sessions will take place in Track Room 2.
Update from IOEMA
This panel discussion will explore the complexities, advantages, risks, and trade-offs involved in turnkey versus disaggregated approaches to submarine cable contract models. The submarine cable industry is evolving rapidly, with diverse stakeholders navigating critical decisions that impact project timelines, costs, technical performance, and operational flexibility. Panelists representing turnkey integrators, vertically integrated turnkey suppliers, cable system owners, and submarine cable consultants will provide unique perspectives and actionable insights. The session will examine the benefits of streamlined project delivery under turnkey models, including reduced coordination challenges and risk centralization, while contrasting them with the flexibility and potential cost savings of disaggregated approaches that allow system owners to select specialized vendors for specific project components. Attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of the factors driving decision-making in submarine cable projects and strategies for navigating this dynamic landscape.
Head to the Exhibition Hall for the chance to network with 1,500 senior-level attendees from the global submarine cable industry.
The accelerating deployment of high‑capacity submarine cable systems, driven by hyperscalers and increasing fiber‑pair counts, is fundamentally reshaping how submarine networks must be tested, characterized, and maintained. As cable infrastructures scale globally, traditional testing approaches struggle to provide the visibility required to protect long‑term performance and availability across the full asset lifecycle.
This presentation explores how next‑generation testing, characterization, and monitoring techniques are evolving to support large‑scale submarine cable deployments. It highlights the growing role of advanced optical performance indicators such as G.OSNR and continuous monitoring in reducing commissioning time, improving fault localization, and enabling faster post‑repair validation. Emphasis is placed on proactive monitoring and data‑driven maintenance to detect degradation early, mitigate risk in the most exposed cable segments, and reduce Mean Time to Repair.
Ultimately, the evolution of submarine cable testing and monitoring is becoming a strategic requirement to protect CAPEX investments while significantly lowering long‑term OPEX through improved availability, optimized maintenance, and reduced operational risk at global scale.
With increasing submarine cable landings in Africa, how do we move forward and build the ecosystem. This presentation gives a view on how to unlock the potential of the African gateway locations.
How evolution of coherent technology is impacting everything from operations to network security.
Subsea cable systems are now critical national and global infrastructure. Yet their cybersecurity programmes often struggle to keep pace with threats such as physical tampering, signal interception, and supply chain vulnerabilities, which are evolving rapidly as regulatory expectations tighten. This session shares practical, field-tested lessons from building a greenfield cybersecurity programme at Trans Americas Fibre System (TAFS), owner of the TAM-1 submarine cable system.
Ferris will walk through the realities of securing complex operational environments, establishing actual security readiness across diverse stakeholders, and embedding NIST-aligned controls into the constraints of cable design, construction, and long-term operations.
The session will also examine how emerging telecom and national security requirements are reshaping subsea security practices, and how operators can adopt a proactive, risk-driven model rather than a compliance-only mindset. Attendees will leave with actionable guidance on:
Participants will gain concrete patterns, pitfalls to avoid, and implementation tactics they can adapt to ensure their subsea infrastructure remains secure and resilient.
Hosted by the SubOptic Association, students, graduates and early careers professionals are invited to join us in Room F for pizza and drinks.
This networking event is also open to anyone currently enrolled in the 2026 SubOptic mentorship programme.
Head to the Exhibition Hall for the chance to network with 1,500 senior-level attendees from the global submarine cable industry.
Grab a drink and get networking! Carry on the conversations from earlier in the day in a more relaxed atmosphere.
Create your personal agenda –check the favourite icon
Head to the Exhibition Hall for the chance to network with 1,500 senior-level attendees from the global submarine cable industry.
Speed networking event for early career professionals to network with senior-level industry executives.
This networking event will be held in Room F.
Head to the Exhibition Hall for the chance to network with 1,500 senior-level attendees from the global submarine cable industry.
AIS and cable sensing technologies are key components of vessel identification and tracking, but not sufficient to predict risk early and mitigate that risk before a cable is damaged.
Anchor dragging, fishing nets and "unknown causes" account for around 70% of reported cable damages, while identity manipulation, AIS gaps, and opaque ownership structures feature regularly in incidents from the Baltic to the Taiwan Strait. With median repair times now exceeding 40 days, the industry can no longer afford to treat cable protection as a reactive discipline.
The question facing cable operators, governments, and hyperscalers alike is “How do we move from monitoring what’s happening to preventing what’s coming? And critically, how do we move from rules-based alerting to behavioural analytics that can model intent, not just position?