|
|
|
|
Our 2008 speakers on board
Eric Lauzon
Chief Information Officer
Nortel Asia, Singapore
Prasad C.V.G
Chief Information Officer
ING Vysya Bank, India
Sornkawee Puranachoti
CTO and Senior VP, IT department
The Stock Exchange of Thailand
 Divyesh Vithlani
Regional CIO, Asia Pacific
Credit Suisse, Singapore
Peter Miao
Head of IT
Hong Kong Housing Society
Sharon Taylor
Chief Architect
ITIL Refresh
Chief Architect
itSMF International Executive Board, Canada
David Wheeldon, FBCS
Co-Author
ITIL® V3 Service Operations, UK
Honorary Vice President
itSMF International
Gary Case
Co-author
ITIL® V3 Continual Service Improvement, Canada
Committee Member
itSMF USA
Ivor Macfarlane
Co-Author
ITIL® V3 Service Transition, UK
Consultant, Global Technology Services
IBM, UK
|
|
|
|
itSMF Asia Summit - 2007 post event statistics
|
Event quick statistics
| Number of attendees |
165 |
| End users |
71% |
| Senior-level attendees |
58% |
| itSMF SG members |
28% |
| Companies present |
92 |
| Countries represented |
17 |
| itSMF Chapters Represented |
10 |
| Sponsors & exhibitors |
13 |
|
|
Attendee break down by country
| Australia/NZ |
12 |
| Hong Kong |
4 |
| India |
4 |
| Indonesia |
3 |
| Malaysia |
4 |
| Philippines |
4 |
| South Korea |
4 |
| Taiwan |
4 |
| Europe |
7 |
| N. America |
3 |
| Middle East |
1 |
| Japan |
1 |
|
Foreign
|
51
|
|
Singapore
|
114
|
|
|
Speaker profile composition
|
|
Speaker composition by country
| Taiwan |
12 |
| South Korea |
4 |
| Japan |
4 |
| Philippines |
3 |
| N. America |
4 |
| Hong Kong |
4 |
| India |
4 |
| Australia |
4 |
| New Zealand |
7 |
| Singapore |
3 |
|
Total
|
29
|
|
|
Customer feedback - Overall event score
| Overall event rating |
2006 |
2007 |
| Excellent |
14 |
4 |
| Very Good |
70 |
50 |
| Good |
12 |
33 |
| Satisfactory |
2 |
6 |
| No Comments |
0 |
0 |
| Unmarked |
2 |
6 |
| Overall event rating comparison |
2006 |
2007 |
| Good |
70 |
33 |
| Very Good/ Excellent |
14 |
54 |
Note: This represents an increase in the percentage of attendees who felt they found the event either “Excellent/Very Good” or “Good” from 84% to 87%. No attendees felt the event required a “Poor” rating this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
